More information will be forthcoming.

Initial observation:

Besides direct interaction, there is another factor not properly investigated in atomics.

1. Proton and Neutron are directly connect.

2. Electrons are not directly connected.

3. Electrons are “always in motion”

Three above is in doubt due to there must be motion for detection to be positive

4. The valence shells occurs (atomic level) does not have direct connection to the atom

Deduction:

1. There IS a direct connect

2. We lack the instruments to detect the direct connect

Further postulate:

1. This phenomena is visible in the Earth

2. This phenomena is visible in the Sun

Macro Atomic Theory - Img 1

2. This phenomena is visible in the galaxy

The known Universe

Query:

At what point in the phenomena no longer visible?

Three things I would like to bring up is some erroneous theories on the center of the Earth.

1. It isn’t the vault of of the leprechauns where they keep their gold

2. It doesn’t have to be a moving mass of metal to produce the Earths North and South poles. Just very hot. And the field of the Earth is not dependent on the rotation of the Earth. Two objects moving together at the same speed, in the same direction are relatively motionless to each other.

3. ‘Theory’ says whats down there. ‘Theory’ said the entire core up to the crust was radioactive heavy metal and the ground was warm because of all the radiation- in the 1950′s as well. It just theory, and really it’s just hypothesis.

Most of everything you hear is wrong and you have to decide for yourself what is right. Because even the brainiacs are at odds with each other.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_tNzeouHC4

I will address the above, so watch this.

Postulates:

1. The ‘eye’ used to measure a single electron has matter and electrons at the time as the experiment

2. There are electrons everywhere even when not ‘in use’.

3. There are electrons in absolute vacuum (without protons present)

4. Electrons are a particle

5. Particles en mass can have a wave effect when motion is involved

6. The ‘eye’ produces a relatively large electro magnetic field

Deduction:

1. Without the presence of any magnetic field, a wave phenomena can be observed

2. With a magnetic presence (due to flux properties then affect electrons. such as those in a magnetron) we get a particle phenomena.

3. The field influences the particles to act less like waves and more like particles

4. Increasing or decrease the flux present will increase / decrease the particle phenomena

Problem solved.

I’m a little concerned that the lightning idea hasn’t been adequately answered and is ‘up in the air’.

So, here goes.

A few postulates first:

1. Sky-to-ground lightning requires a cloud

2. Lightning requires motion of the cloud. Most clouds form locally or have discharged already, but all in all lightning clouds require motion.

3. Lightning follows the laws of electronics.

4. The Earth has a massive electromagnetic field they extends far beyond the atmosphere.

5. A conductor passing across a magnetic field gathers charge

6. A cloud can be a conductor

7. East-West motion is crosses the magnetic field

8. North-South motion does not cross the magnetic field

9. Rising-Falling motion crosses the magnetic field

10. A capacitor is a conductor surrounded by insulation

Now some deduction.

1. The cloud is a conductor

2. The conductor CAN cross the magnetic fields of Earth and become a capacitor

Clouds are capacitors. Capacitor becomes charged and discharges into another terminal is lesser charge (Cloud, Earth, Air).

Problem solved.